Wednesday, April 13, 2011

national debt

Since they now admit that the increased national debt was caused by 2 things:

The Tax cuts initiated by Geroge W Bush (AFTER he left office)
and the cost of the WARS, also caused by George W. Bush

So then, dear Tea Party Republicans and all you conservatives, can you explain to me why the huge national debt is now being blamed on the DEMOCRATS?????

Comments:
Typical liberal comment Sue Ann! Want to share who "they" is?


http://billbotex.blogspot.com/
 
they are poople like you, right wing Christian bible thumpers. Or did I get that wrong from reading your previous posts. BTW, evolution is still happening, hence "mutation" in viral outbreaks. If it were not happening there would only be ONE illness and we wouldn't need scientists to come up with new vaccines for the new "strains" would we?
 
OK, you agree (in writing)it is still happening? Then where is the half-man half-animal? They would have to be all over the place if the THEORY of Evolution was a LAW instead of a THEORY - Google it?

And by the way, mutation is not evolution nor the same as adaptation which is also not accounted for in the THEORY of Evolution. Mutation and adaption both happen, but they are NOT the same thing as evolution (which is a only a THEORY).

Bacteria mutation/adaption is NOT considered in the THEORY of Evolution.

What is a "right wing Christian bible thumper" other than typical liberal name calling hate speech?

There is always this problem when a layman/woman trys to have a LOGICAL discussion with a scientist. Get an education at a non-liberal institution so you can have a discussion without name calling.
 
If you need proof positive of anything then PROVE to me that God exists, and don't tell me you take the word in the Bible as proof. Show me some DNA.

Taking something on FAITH is the same thing as calling it a theory.

So, as far as I can tell, there is a theory that a Supreme Being exists until you have scientific proof.

Yeah I am a liberal, but I also attend church. I just realize that most of the "teaching" of the churches on religion is actually the teaching of men who say they are interpreting prophecy or the teaching of God. You know like David Keresh or Jim Jones.
 
Thanks SA, for the first THOUGHTFUL question you have asked.

I am a scientist because of that, I look at EVERYTHING analytically. I am not a religious zealot. I don't lie, and I can tell you that I do have absolute, scientific irrefutable PROOF of the existence of GOD. Not a faith based BELIEF, not a warm feeling in my heart, etc., etc., etc.

I have learned that most people who have no belief in God have NEVER thought seriously about what would actually be PROOF for them. I can see that here in your first THOUGHTFUL post when you said "Show me some DNA".

When you said "I just realize that most of the "teaching" of the churches on religion is actually the teaching of men who say they are interpreting prophecy or the teaching of God." I can tell you that I once had the EXACT SAME OBSERVATION/FEELING!

So to first start a discussion like this one, we will first have to figure out what would be absolute proof FOR YOU. If you want to have a serious discussion about that here on your blog, I am willing to do that.

One of my favorite movie lines was in a favorite movie of mine, Deja Vu when Denzel Washington asks Paula Patton ("Doug Carlin: "What if you had to tell someone the most important thing in the world, but you knew they'd never believe you?")
and Paula replies (Claire Kuchever: "I'd try.)"

It really IS an important question!
 
what? no answer to my thread because I sent it to the wrong posat? Try going up one to the previous post and reading that.
 
what? no answer to my thread because I sent it to the wrong posat? Try going up one to the previous post and reading that.

????? I don't understand the above post?
 
Try reading the last two posts under the topic natural disasters. That's one topic above this one, or one post up". I guess sceintists can't follow directions quite as well as I expected. But then I only learned how to reason things out in a liberal arts setting, not a lab.
 
You win SA, because I don't consider what we have been doing as real communication - its been more like a "cat & dog" fight for me, and I don't enjoy those.
 
I find that most people when confronted with truth which shakes the foundations of their belief give up.
 
"Confrontation" does not equal "Discussion"
 
For some people there is no discussion. The "don't confuse me with facts. I know what I know."
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?